|
There is an impression, that web 2.0 is thought up by the large companies in interests of the large companies, under a specious excuse to make the Internet more purely and better. Criteria of cleanliness will be defined, most likely, by the same founders of the term web 2.0.
At present it is difficult to allocate in what innovation web 2.0 as anything concrete in this direction for the present it is not made, but: "That it is possible to find in web 2.0 essentially new rather web 1.0?" As a matter of fact anything, it only the arch of new ideological rules on which it is offered to build relations in a network between users and owners of sites.
Thus, in my opinion, there is an obvious attempt under the pretext of improvement of quality of Internet resources to supersede from the market the small companies and individual owners of sites, the same bloggers which keep the diaries not on web 2.0 service and in an individual order. And thanks to money which are at the large companies will make it not so difficult. It is enough to accustom of all to thought, that if the site is not recognised as the project web 2.0 the site does not have the trust, inconvenient, is made by laymans etc.
To convince the inhabitant it is possible in everything. The main thing long to repeat same. Also there are in a network one social sites, catalogues of bookmarks, archives of files and other services for the general using.
I do not know as to you, and to me while it is all it seems dullish enough.
From Web it is pleasant to 2.0 me Blogcatalog, Technorati and MySpace.
|
Add to del.icio.us 
Can you digg it?
Linear Mode
