PDA

View Full Version : For the love of money


KWJams
04-23-2003, 01:01 AM
<<-Story Here->> (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15009-2003Apr22.html) :(


LONDON, April 22 -- A British newspaper reported today that it had obtained Iraqi intelligence files showing that the deposed government of Saddam Hussein paid close to $600,000 a year to a British lawmaker who is an outspoken member of the anti-war movement.

The papers say that George Galloway, the lawmaker, met with an Iraqi intelligence agent and sought a larger portion of the revenues, which came in part from the U.N.-administered oil-for-food program, which was intended to allow Iraq to import humanitarian supplies, the Daily Telegraph reported.

One memo, a report from the chief of Iraqi intelligence to Hussein's office, states that Galloway was getting a percentage of Iraqi oil revenues and food contracts that, in the Telegraph's calculation, amounted to 375,000 British pounds per year, or nearly $600,000.

The newspaper said that David Blair, one of its correspondents in Baghdad, located the documents in the burned and looted foreign ministry headquarters. The signature of the intelligence chief on a documented dated Jan. 2, 2000, is illegible, the newspaper said.

Galloway today strongly denied taking money from the Iraqi government and said the documents were forgeries and part of a smear campaign against him, which he suggested was organized either by the British government or by the staunchly right-of-center Telegraph.

"I have never solicited nor received money from Iraq for our campaign against war and sanctions," he said in a statement. "I have never seen a barrel of oil, never owned one, never bought one, never sold one."

"Maybe it is the product of the same forgers who forged so many other things in this whole Iraq picture," the Telegraph quoted him as saying. "Maybe the Daily Telegraph forged it. Who knows?"

Dubbed the "member for Baghdad Central" by some lawmakers and "Gorgeous George" by others, Galloway, 48, is a maverick member of the ruling Labor Party who is widely derided in Parliament as an apologist for Hussein. He was a regular speaker at the mass anti-war rallies that shook Prime Minister Tony Blair's government earlier this year when Blair authorized British forces to join the American military campaign in Iraq.

Galloway headed the Mariam Appeal, named after an Iraqi child, which raised funds for humanitarian purposes inside Iraq and campaigned for lifting the U.N. trade sanctions against Iraq. He said that the fund did not receive any financial help from Iraq for its activities.

The documents indicate that Galloway was receiving a cut of oil revenues through an intermediary in Iraq, Jordanian businessman Fawaz Zureikat. The alleged memo says Zureikat told Iraqi intelligence that Galloway needed "continuous financial support from Iraq."

"His projects and future plans for the benefit of the country need financial support to become a motive for him to do more work," says the purported memo. It also details an alleged meeting between Galloway and an unnamed Iraqi spy in December 1999.

Galloway said today that such a meeting never took place. In his statement he acknowledged that Zureikat was chairman of the appeal, and one of its three main sources of funding, along with the governments of the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia.

Among the papers found in the Baghdad, the Telegraph reported, was a letter signed by Galloway stating that Zureikat was the appeal's representative in Baghdad.

But Galloway said the paper's claim he had met Iraqi intelligence officials was incorrect "to the best of my knowledge."

"Given that I have had access over the years to Iraq's political leadership, most often the deputy prime minister Tariq Aziz, I would have absolutely no reason to be meeting with an official of Iraqi intelligence," stated Galloway, who said he would sue the Telegraph for libel.

He said: "I have never in my life to my knowledge ever met an Iraqi intelligence agent."

Telegraph correspondent Blair insisted the papers were genuine. He told the BBC: "I think it would require an enormous amount of imagination to believe that someone went to the trouble of composing a forged document in Arabic and then planting it in a file of patently authentic documents and burying it in a darkened room on the off-chance that a British journalist might happen upon it and might bother to translate it. That strikes me as so wildly improbable as to be virtually inconceivable."

But Galloway said that Blair acknowledged that the other contents of the ministry had been completely destroyed. "He couldn't explain why these files were unburned and un-destroyed," he told the BBC. "And if you follow the Telegraph group you'll see that the previous Sunday they came up with intelligence issues surrounding France, the week before that, intelligence issues surrounding Russia and this week it's me.

"It seems that the Telegraph group are the sewer of choice for those interested in intelligence matters."

He visited Iraq on several occasions and held talks with Hussein and key members of his government. "Sir, I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability," he once told the Iraqi dictator.

He already faced expulsion from the Labor Party, after telling Abu Dhabi Television in an interview during the military campaign that Tony Blair and George Bush were "wolves" for the "crime" of military action against Iraq.

One Foreign Office minister, Ben Bradshaw, accused Galloway of being "not just an apologist but a mouthpiece for the Iraq regime over many years."

© 2003 The Washington Post Company

kemikalfire
04-23-2003, 01:14 AM
riiight...funny how the British newspaper "claims to have a memo" but never offer it up as proof, only claims to have found it. If it does exist, then he is screwed politically, but at the same time, the memo was dated long before this war against terrorisim ever started...I'm just glad no American members of government, past or present, would ever accept money from special intrest groups or countries to sway legislation...oh wait...

KWJams
04-23-2003, 01:36 AM
Originally posted by kemikalfire
I'm just glad no American members of government, past or present, would ever accept money from special intrest groups or countries to sway legislation...oh wait... .......there was that recent Clinton/Gore Grand Staircase Escalante deal ---- and the Buddist Temple fund raising ---- and Barbara Boxer's husbands ties to China. :rolleyes:

Pegasus
04-23-2003, 01:52 AM
*lol* On one hand, it's nice to know that the British media is fallable. It means that it's not only North American journalists with the .. umm... penchant for sensationalism? ;)

From what I've read though, there's not a hope in h*ll of them convincing me there's any truth to the story. Most journalists have problems with *English* never mind something as complex and Arabic. *rotfl* And you expect me to believe that a journalist, pawing through abandoned documents written in a foreign scrawl, is going to have enough wit to translate just the one document? That he's even going to recognize it as something of value?

Hooo-boy! And I thought *I* wrote some reasonably respectable fairy tales! I wonder if that story could be nominated for the Pulitzer Prize - for fiction. Sheesh!

<sigh> But the saddest part? There are obviously some chum who will believe it. They'll believe anything.

For what value it may be to him, Galloway has my sympathy. Best I can offer him from this side of the pond.

Peg

KWJams
04-23-2003, 02:04 AM
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,9115,941655,00.html

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=focusIraqNews&storyID=2608532

And here is a list of 246 more--->

http://news.google.com/news?num=30&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&q=cluster:www%2edailytelegraph%2eco%2euk%2fnews%2fmain%2ejhtml%3fxml%3d%2fnews%2f2003%2f04%2f22%2fni nter22%2exml%26sSheet%3d%2fnews%2f2003%2f04%2f22%2fixnewstop%2ehtml

I would say that someone will get fried over this story--either the reporter or Mr Galloway. :rolleyes:

Pegasus
04-23-2003, 02:11 AM
Maybe the reporter *and* the editor that allowed that to be published?

Peg

Horus_Kol
04-23-2003, 02:58 AM
I really don't think that a paper like the Telegraph would be dumb enough to make accusations on that scale without holding something that they genuinely believe to be proof.

They would know that it is really actionable to do so.


Funny though, I heard this morning that it could have "been planted by MI5".... Why would the internal MI be operating in Iraq - thats what MI6 is for, isn't it?

Pegasus
04-23-2003, 03:15 AM
Planted by MI5? Well, that sort of makes sense, if Galloway's been making loud noises about peace. I can see where some feathers may get ruffled by that. It's just not the done thing. Or so I've been told.

Mind you, if MI5 *is* involved, odds are there won't be much of an investigation into it. "Classified Top Secret" and "A Matter of National Security" and whatever else they can scrounge up as an excuse. It wouldn't be the first time.

No, given the circumstances of the document's discovery, however it got into the paper's hands, I have trouble believing it's true. It just seems too pat, too convenient. Only one document naming only one person? Documents like that don't get "misfiled" that easily. Not when you consider that, under the Iraqi government of the time, you could quite literally "lose your head" for such a mistake.

Peg

Horus_Kol
04-23-2003, 03:23 AM
but MI5 is internal - works with the police against terrorist groups and such.

MI6 is the one that would have been operating in Iraq (if indeed anyone was).

kevin
04-23-2003, 04:10 AM
Me thinks Mr. Galloway protesteth too much ;)

Pegasus
04-23-2003, 04:36 AM
Originally posted by Horus_Kol
but MI5 is internal - works with the police against terrorist groups and such.

MI6 is the one that would have been operating in Iraq (if indeed anyone was). That's the part that almost confuses me, but I suppose inter-agency co-operation is possible....

When you consider the level of paranoia these days, though, Horus, having a member of the government be so vocally anti-war might be considered as suspect. Add to that the fact that Galloway sometimes does have legitimate business with the Iraqis.... What better way to shut up a protester by discrediting him? In the long run, it's less hassle than killing him, don't you think?

McCarthyism is alive and well, thank you very much. The only difference now is that the "enemy" is Iraq, not the USSR and Communism.

But, as you say, "If indeed anyone was". We'll have to see how it plays out, I guess.

Peg

KWJams
05-05-2003, 11:25 AM
<<-Story Here-> (http://www.albawaba.com/news/index.php3?sid=248194&lang=e&dir=news)

Typical for a politician to go off on a tirade rather than answering a direct question -- :rolleyes:

Blueangel
05-05-2003, 12:26 PM
Originally posted by KWJams
Typical for a politician to go off on a tirade rather than answering a direct question -- :rolleyes: Very true!
I'm finding out to my cost lately, that anyone trained in the art of negotiation, has a irritating habit of answering a direct question with the phrase..."I think what you're trying to say is....".
This is just a preamble into putting forward a question that they ARE prepared to answer.
Why can't people give straight honest answers to straight questions?
Ok...they may drop themselves in the at deep end or even lose their liberty for a short while, but their reputation is in tatters anyway so what the heck!
At least if our politicians were slightly more honest, they may scrape back a tiny modicum of respect.

KWJams
05-06-2003, 10:57 AM
<-Story Here-> (http://www.guardian.co.uk/0,6961,,00.html)

LATEST: George Galloway has been suspended from the Labour party pending 'internal party investigations', the party's general secretary has announced. More details soon ...